Due diligence is one of the most used and least understood terms in the gold trade. Buyers are told to conduct it. Sellers claim to welcome it. Brokers assure everyone it has already been done. Yet when we ask a prospective client what due diligence they have actually carried out, the answer is usually some combination of reading the documents, speaking to the seller, and forming an impression. None of that is due diligence. It is familiarity, and familiarity is not verification.
This article sets out what due diligence actually involves in an African gold transaction: what can be checked, what can be checked only on the ground, what cannot be verified at all, and what we typically find when we look properly. The aim is to give you a realistic picture of what genuine verification requires before you rely on anyone, including us, to provide it.
What Due Diligence Actually Reviews
A complete due diligence process in a gold transaction covers four broad areas: the documents, the counterparty, the gold itself, and the structure of the deal. Each requires a different method and a different level of access.
The documents. Export licences, mineral trading permits, assay certificates, certificates of origin, company registration documents, and any government correspondence. The task is not to read them and judge whether they look professional. It is to verify each one against the records of the body that supposedly issued it.
The counterparty. Who you are actually dealing with. Whether the company exists, whether it holds the licences it claims, whether the individual presenting the deal has authority to act for that company, and whether any of the parties have a history that should concern you.
The gold. Whether the material exists, whether it is what it is claimed to be, and whether the quantity and purity match the documentation. This is the area buyers most often assume is covered by an assay certificate. It is not.
The deal structure. Whether the payment terms, fees, escrow arrangements, and delivery mechanism are consistent with a legitimate transaction or designed to extract money before any gold moves.
What Can Be Verified Remotely
A surprising amount can be established without leaving a desk, provided you have the right contacts and knowledge of how each jurisdiction works. This is the foundation of our 24-Hour Transaction Risk Assessment, which reviews a documentation package and counterparty details and returns a written assessment within 24 hours.
Remotely, a competent reviewer can check company registration against the relevant national registry, confirm whether a mineral trading or export licence number actually exists in the issuing authority's records, identify inconsistencies across the documentation package, verify assay certificate authenticity directly with the issuing laboratory, check domain registration dates and digital footprint against claimed company history, and assess whether the deal structure and fee requests match known fraud patterns.
This level of review catches the majority of fraudulent transactions, because most fraud fails at the first verification step. A forged export licence with a reference number that does not exist in the registry is exposed in a single phone call. The document looked perfect. The record behind it was never real.
What Requires an On-Ground Visit
Some things cannot be verified from a distance, regardless of how good your contacts are. These require physical presence in the country, which is the basis of our On-Ground Due Diligence service.
Confirming that a mine exists, is operational, and produces what is claimed requires a site visit. Confirming that the individual you have been communicating with is the person they claim to be, and that they genuinely represent the company, often requires meeting them in person and seeing original documents rather than scans. Witnessing the gold, confirming its quantity, and overseeing independent testing with an unbroken chain of custody requires someone physically present at the point of testing and transfer. This is covered by our Independent Assay and Testing Oversight service, which exists specifically because remote assurance of physical gold is impossible.
The bar swap fraud, where genuine gold is tested and then substituted before transfer, can only be defeated by physical oversight. No document review, however thorough, protects against a substitution that happens in the room after the test is complete.
What Cannot Be Verified at All
Honest due diligence includes being clear about its limits. Some things cannot be verified with certainty by anyone, and any advisor who claims otherwise is overstating what is possible.
Future intentions cannot be verified. A counterparty who is legitimate today may not behave legitimately tomorrow. Verification establishes the facts as they are at the time of checking, not a guarantee of future conduct. The ultimate source of funds or gold, several layers back, may be impossible to establish definitively in markets where informal supply chains are common. And in jurisdictions where official records are incomplete or poorly maintained, the absence of a record is not always proof that something does not exist. A good advisor tells you where the limits of verification lie rather than pretending they do not exist.
What We Typically Find
When we conduct due diligence on a transaction a client believed was sound, the findings tend to fall into a few categories.
Most commonly, the documentation is internally inconsistent. The weight on the assay certificate does not match the export licence. The company name on the registration differs subtly from the name on the correspondence. The dates do not align. These inconsistencies are invisible to someone reading for impression rather than checking field by field.
Frequently, a licence or permit reference number does not exist in the issuing authority's records. The document is a competent forgery. Often, the company is real but the person presenting the deal has no verifiable connection to it. And in a meaningful number of cases, everything checks out, the transaction is legitimate, and our role is simply to confirm that the client can proceed with confidence. Verification is not only about finding fraud. It is about establishing the truth in either direction.
Common Misconceptions
"I have the documents, so the deal is verified." Having documents and verifying documents are entirely different things. A document is a claim. Verification is confirming that claim against an independent source.
"The seller welcomed due diligence, so they must be legitimate." Sophisticated fraud operators welcome due diligence, because they have prepared for it. They provide documents quickly and answer questions confidently. Welcoming scrutiny is not the same as surviving it.
"An assay certificate proves the gold is real." An assay certificate proves that, at some point, some material was tested. It does not prove that the material you will receive is the material that was tested, that the certificate is genuine, or that the laboratory named actually issued it.
"My broker has done the due diligence." A broker who is paid on completion has a financial interest in the deal closing. That is not independence. Genuine due diligence requires someone whose only interest is in establishing the truth, regardless of whether the deal proceeds.
The Practical Sequence
For most transactions, due diligence proceeds in stages matched to the level of commitment. An initial document and counterparty review establishes whether the transaction is worth pursuing at all, and catches the majority of fraud at low cost. If that review is satisfactory and the transaction is significant, a fuller verification extends to direct confirmation with authorities and deeper counterparty checks. Only once those stages are passed, and where the value justifies it, does on-ground verification of the mine, the counterparty, and the gold itself become worthwhile.
Proceeding in this order means you are never spending money on deep verification of a transaction that a basic check would have shown to be fraudulent. It also means that by the time you commit funds, every layer that could be independently established has been.
Not Sure What Level of Due Diligence Your Deal Needs?
Send us the details of your transaction and we will tell you what can be verified, what it would involve, and where the real risks lie. Our 24-Hour Transaction Risk Assessment returns a written report within 24 hours for a fixed fee of USD 300.
Submit Your Deal for Review →